<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for LQ Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radio.linuxquestions.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org</link>
	<description>Open Talk... about Open Source and Linux</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on LQ Radio Episode #3 - Open Talk about Open Source and Linux by Life Insurance blog</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2005/07/lq-radio-episode-3-open-talk-about-open-source-and-linux.html#comment-131128</link>
		<dc:creator>Life Insurance blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2005/07/lq-radio-episode-3-open-talk-about-open-source-and-linux.html#comment-131128</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;the insurance companies don't want you to know...&lt;/strong&gt;

Information on the life insurance industry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>the insurance companies don&#8217;t want you to know&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Information on the life insurance industry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LinuxQuestions.org Podcast - 01.07.08 by angryfirelord</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2008/01/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-010708.html#comment-125560</link>
		<dc:creator>angryfirelord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2008/01/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-010708.html#comment-125560</guid>
		<description>Glad to see that SCO is on its last legs. Hopefully that scourge will be eradicated soon. 

As for McAfee, well, that's what you get for violating legal terms. Either comply with the GPL and release the source code or rewrite the code (as was stated in the podcast). 

Another enjoyable podcast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see that SCO is on its last legs. Hopefully that scourge will be eradicated soon. </p>
<p>As for McAfee, well, that&#8217;s what you get for violating legal terms. Either comply with the GPL and release the source code or rewrite the code (as was stated in the podcast). </p>
<p>Another enjoyable podcast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LQ Radio Interview #2 - James Turner and Dee-Ann LeBlanc by jeremy</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2005/05/lq-radio-interview-2-james-turner-and-dee-ann-leblanc.html#comment-124556</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2005/05/lq-radio-interview-2-james-turner-and-dee-ann-leblanc.html#comment-124556</guid>
		<description>http://mirror.linuxquestions.org/pub/lqradio/interviews/LQRadio-TurnerAndLeBlanc.ogg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mirror.linuxquestions.org/pub/lqradio/interviews/LQRadio-TurnerAndLeBlanc.ogg" rel="nofollow">http://mirror.linuxquestions.org/pub/lqradio/interviews/LQRadio-TurnerAndLeBlanc.ogg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LQ Radio Interview #2 - James Turner and Dee-Ann LeBlanc by portamenteff</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2005/05/lq-radio-interview-2-james-turner-and-dee-ann-leblanc.html#comment-124554</link>
		<dc:creator>portamenteff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2005/05/lq-radio-interview-2-james-turner-and-dee-ann-leblanc.html#comment-124554</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I was just wondering "How do I get the .ogg instead?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I was just wondering &#8220;How do I get the .ogg instead?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A new podcast will be posted soon by Niomi</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/11/a-new-podcast-will-be-posted-soon.html#comment-120187</link>
		<dc:creator>Niomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/11/a-new-podcast-will-be-posted-soon.html#comment-120187</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeremy. Just wanted to let you know that the LQ podcast is my favorite podcast. I'm looking forward to a new episode from LQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeremy. Just wanted to let you know that the LQ podcast is my favorite podcast. I&#8217;m looking forward to a new episode from LQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LinuxQuestions.org Podcast - 09.13.07 by David Tangye</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/09/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-091307.html#comment-101276</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tangye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/09/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-091307.html#comment-101276</guid>
		<description>Agreed.

Actually, I was waiting for more disagreement to what at the end of my post was most likely a flawed argument. None coming, so I shall argue with myself. :-)

The signs are not really pointing the way I had said. Remember when M$ decided to build their own internet. It was called MSN. Reminds me of the Dilbert comic where the PHB decided 'I fixed the internet' one day. M$ was wanting to say 'I replaced the internet'. When you look back at it, it is equally as absurd, and shows the incredible arrogance of any one company, no matter how powerful, that they thought they could take over the world's communications channel. They have probably rewritten history by now to attempt to state that MSN was only ever going to be apps and services leveraging the internet, not a complete alternative to it. Unfortunately for them it is a free global world, where million of people still have the evidence to the contrary.

Anyway, back to the issue. Their days of knocking off one company at a time and thereby gaining significantly are now over. I open-source land, where are far too many players, and many many are small and if fact individuals. The strength of open-source is in the diffusion of power.

Subverting the open data standard by attempting to effectively replace OpenDoc with OOXML might still be a bit of an issue though. However the same quality of open-source, that shear strength and resilience of a planet full of individuals, will undoubtedly have to ability to counter this issue too. It really does not matter what the issue might be, a planet-full of free people will always prevail one way or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.</p>
<p>Actually, I was waiting for more disagreement to what at the end of my post was most likely a flawed argument. None coming, so I shall argue with myself. :-)</p>
<p>The signs are not really pointing the way I had said. Remember when M$ decided to build their own internet. It was called MSN. Reminds me of the Dilbert comic where the PHB decided &#8216;I fixed the internet&#8217; one day. M$ was wanting to say &#8216;I replaced the internet&#8217;. When you look back at it, it is equally as absurd, and shows the incredible arrogance of any one company, no matter how powerful, that they thought they could take over the world&#8217;s communications channel. They have probably rewritten history by now to attempt to state that MSN was only ever going to be apps and services leveraging the internet, not a complete alternative to it. Unfortunately for them it is a free global world, where million of people still have the evidence to the contrary.</p>
<p>Anyway, back to the issue. Their days of knocking off one company at a time and thereby gaining significantly are now over. I open-source land, where are far too many players, and many many are small and if fact individuals. The strength of open-source is in the diffusion of power.</p>
<p>Subverting the open data standard by attempting to effectively replace OpenDoc with OOXML might still be a bit of an issue though. However the same quality of open-source, that shear strength and resilience of a planet full of individuals, will undoubtedly have to ability to counter this issue too. It really does not matter what the issue might be, a planet-full of free people will always prevail one way or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LinuxQuestions.org Podcast - 09.13.07 by angryfirelord</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/09/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-091307.html#comment-101150</link>
		<dc:creator>angryfirelord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/09/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-091307.html#comment-101150</guid>
		<description>I'm not so sure that any method created by Microsoft will work today. Maybe five years ago it would've worked, but they've dished out too much FUD. Red Hat is a very strong company with gaining subscribers, so I don't think even Microsoft can take down the open-source world at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure that any method created by Microsoft will work today. Maybe five years ago it would&#8217;ve worked, but they&#8217;ve dished out too much FUD. Red Hat is a very strong company with gaining subscribers, so I don&#8217;t think even Microsoft can take down the open-source world at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LinuxQuestions.org Podcast - 09.13.07 by RHLinuxGUY</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/09/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-091307.html#comment-100899</link>
		<dc:creator>RHLinuxGUY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/09/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-091307.html#comment-100899</guid>
		<description>It's nice that's it back.  Keep up the good stuff Jeremy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice that&#8217;s it back.  Keep up the good stuff Jeremy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LinuxQuestions.org Podcast - 09.13.07 by David Tangye</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/09/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-091307.html#comment-100808</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tangye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/09/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-091307.html#comment-100808</guid>
		<description>Good to listen in while I take a break and make a sandwich.

ps. re your comment regarding why would that new M$ website focus on Redhat and not Linux in general? Here is another reason: its the old Microsoft strategy: divide and conquer. How do you think they got to where they are? One hit at a time. One company at a time. Year in, year out. Its worked brilliantly well over decades. Never change a winning strategy. They will never change. Never. The only answer for a while was to break them up. However the US court system proved to be too corrupt, weak or both to do that. Now that chance is lost. Next step for M$: eliminate the open world. Sorry to say, but the signs are all pointing to them winning. How? One step at a time. One company at a time. One standard at a time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to listen in while I take a break and make a sandwich.</p>
<p>ps. re your comment regarding why would that new M$ website focus on Redhat and not Linux in general? Here is another reason: its the old Microsoft strategy: divide and conquer. How do you think they got to where they are? One hit at a time. One company at a time. Year in, year out. Its worked brilliantly well over decades. Never change a winning strategy. They will never change. Never. The only answer for a while was to break them up. However the US court system proved to be too corrupt, weak or both to do that. Now that chance is lost. Next step for M$: eliminate the open world. Sorry to say, but the signs are all pointing to them winning. How? One step at a time. One company at a time. One standard at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LinuxQuestions.org Podcast - 09.13.07 by michao</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/09/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-091307.html#comment-100592</link>
		<dc:creator>michao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2007/09/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-091307.html#comment-100592</guid>
		<description>Great! Thanks and keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Thanks and keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
