<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinuxQuestions.org Podcast - 07.13.06</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-071306.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-071306.html</link>
	<description>Open Talk... about Open Source and Linux</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-071306.html#comment-40599</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-071306.html#comment-40599</guid>
		<description>In the long term this is certainly true, at least theoretically.  From my point of view, anything that can serve to reduce vendor lockin is a goos thing.

--jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the long term this is certainly true, at least theoretically.  From my point of view, anything that can serve to reduce vendor lockin is a goos thing.</p>
<p>&#8211;jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jza</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-071306.html#comment-40568</link>
		<dc:creator>Jza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-071306.html#comment-40568</guid>
		<description>I suggest you to listen to eweeks podcast on the .NET vs LAMP stack. I guess they never intend to have a definite study but a window opening on the dialog and at least shed some experiences. 

The topic agree by everyone was &lt;strong&gt;very&lt;/strong&gt; ambitious and missleading in consequence. The .NET stack is something that is meant to work better with each other, which is the same situation is most of the other software stacks enviroments. However FLOSS also has the same advantages such as community supported, applications and framework choices and different ways to manage the stack. 

As far as performance goes, the Linux part seemed to be the weakest link on the studies when they saw better performance on a WAMP stack. This is interesting since I think the WAMP installations usually come with the php accelerator pre-packaged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest you to listen to eweeks podcast on the .NET vs LAMP stack. I guess they never intend to have a definite study but a window opening on the dialog and at least shed some experiences. </p>
<p>The topic agree by everyone was <strong>very</strong> ambitious and missleading in consequence. The .NET stack is something that is meant to work better with each other, which is the same situation is most of the other software stacks enviroments. However FLOSS also has the same advantages such as community supported, applications and framework choices and different ways to manage the stack. </p>
<p>As far as performance goes, the Linux part seemed to be the weakest link on the studies when they saw better performance on a WAMP stack. This is interesting since I think the WAMP installations usually come with the php accelerator pre-packaged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jza</title>
		<link>http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-071306.html#comment-40558</link>
		<dc:creator>Jza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radio.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/linuxquestionsorg-podcast-071306.html#comment-40558</guid>
		<description>The openoffice.org community and ODF group has come to the idea that microsoft adoption is actually a good thing. The adoption of odf will help the migration argument. Having office and openoffice.org running on odf makes the compatibility from 90% to 100% making the free software proposal a heavier one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The openoffice.org community and ODF group has come to the idea that microsoft adoption is actually a good thing. The adoption of odf will help the migration argument. Having office and openoffice.org running on odf makes the compatibility from 90% to 100% making the free software proposal a heavier one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
